Transcriptome response of high- and low-light-adapted Prochlorococcus strains to changing iron availability.

TitleTranscriptome response of high- and low-light-adapted Prochlorococcus strains to changing iron availability.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsThompson, AW, Huang, K, Saito, MA, Chisholm, SW
JournalISME J
Volume5
Issue10
Pagination1580-94
Date Published2011 Oct
ISSN1751-7370
KeywordsBacterial Proteins, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Iron, Light, Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes, Oceans and Seas, Prochlorococcus
Abstract

Prochlorococcus contributes significantly to ocean primary productivity. The link between primary productivity and iron in specific ocean regions is well established and iron limitation of Prochlorococcus cell division rates in these regions has been shown. However, the extent of ecotypic variation in iron metabolism among Prochlorococcus and the molecular basis for differences is not understood. Here, we examine the growth and transcriptional response of Prochlorococcus strains, MED4 and MIT9313, to changing iron concentrations. During steady state, MIT9313 sustains growth at an order-of-magnitude lower iron concentration than MED4. To explore this difference, we measured the whole-genome transcriptional response of each strain to abrupt iron starvation and rescue. Only four of the 1159 orthologs of MED4 and MIT9313 were differentially expressed in response to iron in both strains. However, in each strain, the expression of over a hundred additional genes changed, many of which are in labile genomic regions, suggesting a role for lateral gene transfer in establishing diversity of iron metabolism among Prochlorococcus. Furthermore, we found that MED4 lacks three genes near the iron-deficiency-induced gene (idiA) that are present and induced by iron stress in MIT9313. These genes are interesting targets for studying the adaptation of natural Prochlorococcus assemblages to local iron conditions as they show more diversity than other genomic regions in environmental metagenomic databases.

DOI10.1038/ismej.2011.49
Alternate JournalISME J
PubMed ID21562599
PubMed Central IDPMC3176520